On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> This is not a priority (we need to finish our first stable release of
> the WYSIWYG editor first) but I wanted to propose 2 things and start a
> discussion on it:
>
> * That we make our new GWT WYSIWYG editor a top level project (i.e.
> with a separate jira, separate wiki like http://wysiwyg.xwiki.org with
> a better name, etc)
> * Make it usable by someone who is not using XWiki
>
> The rationale is:
> * If we want our editor to become strong and compete with the likes of
> FCKEditor/TinyMCE we need to open it up to others and for that we need
> to:
> - advertise it (hence the http://wysiwyg.xwiki.org that would lists
> all features same as http://www.fckeditor.net/)
> - make it be usable easily and thus without dragging xwiki dependencies
>
> Other options:
> 1) Don't do anything. Cons: we won't get enough help and it'll be hard
> to compete with other editors. They'll have more features/less bugs
> and we'll have a hard time keeping up. In addition it's possible
> someone else creates a new GWT WYSIWYG editor and it would be better
> if we could all join force on that and using what we have started
> 2) Externalize it on some forge other than the xwiki forge. This is
> nice from a marketing point of view (i.e. easier to show it as a pure
> wysiwyg editor) but it has some drawbacks:
> - further from the xwiki community and thus harder for us to maintain
> it there
> - doesn't strengthen our xwiki project
>
> In addition, what we need to evaluate is how do we make it independent
> of xwiki and how long would that take. This is probably more a
> question for Marius. Marius this is not urgent compared to the 1.7.1
> release. Whenever you have time.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>

big +1, as Vincent said if we want it to be a strong WYSIWYG editor,
we need people to use it and contribute. And we would get a lot more
people and especially developers if make it standalone.

For the details I would be in favor of really externalize it as I
think it will get more people if it's clear it's a generic WYSIWYG
editor but yes it would not be seen as a XWiki strength anymore.

-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to