On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea < [email protected]> wrote:
> Thomas Mortagne wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thomas Mortagne wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Thomas Mortagne wrote: > >> [snip] > >> > >>> Does this means it's impossible to have a second level list in XHTML ? > >> Yes, afaik a 2nd level list must be nested within a 1st level list item. > >> > >> I'm planing to overwrite the default support for lists in the WYSIWYG > >> editor (see http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3061 ) and I'm for > >> preventing Nth level lists without a N-1th level. > >> > >>>> For me > >>>> > >>>> ** list item > >>>> > >>>> is not valid since you can't have a 2nd level list without a 1st level > >>>> one. And even if you consider it valid, I don't see why you need to > >>>> generate a different, invalid, XHTML for it. > >>> Even if it's not valid for XHTML it should be a XHTML renderer choice > >>> and not XWiki parser. > >>> > >>> For me, on the wiki syntax side, this is perfectly valid, the same way > >>> that you can start heading in a page by a second level header for > >>> example. > >> I really don't see the need for having 2nd level list without a 1st > >> level list. Why would a use want it? > > > > Why not ;) > > > > More seriously, adding the first level automatically when user only > > written second level list in wiki syntax is a specific support and for > > me it's useless at XWiki parser level. So it's simply easier and > > cleaner for the code to "support" second level lists. And for me since > > the grammar support it I don't see why we should not allow it on > > parser side. > > > > The fact that XHTML renderer does not support it has nothing to do > > with the XWiki parser, it's up to XHTML parser to protect itself since > > the XDOM allow it, any macro can generate second level list. For > > example if you only have second and third level headers, toc macro > > will generate second and first level list. Tox macro should not have > > to add the first level list item or convert the second level in first > > level because both are incorrect. > > Semantically speaking a 2nd level list is a sublist of a 1st level list. > Following this logic you can't have a 2nd level list without a 1st level > list. I don't see why XDOM supports it. > > Regarding the toc macro, I don't see the relation between header level > and list level. I guess the toc macro generates: > > ** h2 > **** h4 > > for > > == h2 == > ==== h4 ==== > > while I personally expect > > * h2 > ** h4 > > My fear is that supporting 2nd level list without a 1st level list is > going to be a pain for the WYSIWYG. This could be enought to win the debate if it's really a pain ;) > > > > > >>> Also, it's valid in OpenOffice or MSWord so this is another limitation > >>> when importing. > >>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Marius > >>>> > >>>>> See also http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3057 > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> devs mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devs mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
