Hi JV, On Jan 5, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I'd really like to have a way to filter/search macros. I want to be >> able to type "ht" and all macros containing "ht" in their names or >> description or parameter description would be listed. >> > > I guess this could be done with a suggest input at the bottom as seen > in the link dialogs mockup. > I suggest to put this in the "possible improvements to keep in mind" > category since it's a power user need and we don't have that much > macros ftm. I'm pretty sure this is not a power user feature. It's like saying search are for power users... Google.com has probably proven it's not the case :) >> Re macros we also need to define behaviors: > > I thought this had been voted before but it was a proposal : > http://markmail.org/message/zz2iyc6lhjgtvwja Yes but I thought we were re-voting on everything in each UI domain. I'm fine if we agreed about something but I can't find it on http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewWysiwygEditorInterface#HMacros so it wasn't recorded as agreed on. I haven't scanned past discussions but if you have then maybe you could move the result on that page for all topics that were agreed on? >> * Rendered macros > > We must support them as well as "placeholder macros" IMO. I don't understand what a "placeholder macro" is (did you mean "macro placeholder"?). Maybe you mean a "placeholder mode" which can be toggled on/off. If so would be nice to include it in the UI proposal to see where it would be located. >> * Outline around macro block when cursor is inside a macro rendered >> content > > I think we should always keep this outline to have a visual hint for > "everything in this box is not editable". > >> * Ability to double click inside macro content and it opens up the >> edit dialog box? > > +0. > >> * When is the rendered macro content refreshed? Manual refresh >> button? >> (the easiest I think) > > From the thread linked aboved I understood that we'd have to refresh > the whole page ? Do you suggest to have a top level refresh button or > did I missed something ? That's what we had discussed. Now I don't see that button in your UI proposal. >> * What about macros that take a lot of space like an {{include}}? Do >> we offer a button to "fold"/"unfold" macros? > > I think this is the kind of macro that should be represented by a > placeholder. Has stated in a previous thread having included document > displayed inline in the editor would distract editors from the page > content itself. This will be also needed by other macros like "map" > (mentioned by Jerome) where having an iframe in our WYSIWYG iframe > could be a problem and, if not, performance would certainly be. Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
