asiri (SVN) wrote:
> Author: asiri
> Date: 2009-01-11 06:57:24 +0100 (Sun, 11 Jan 2009)
> New Revision: 15301
>
> Modified:
>
> platform/core/trunk/xwiki-officeimporter/src/main/java/org/xwiki/officeimporter/OfficeImporterContext.java
> Log:
> XWIKI-3083: Develop the initial feature set for the Office Importer module
>
> * Minor refactoring.
>
> Modified:
> platform/core/trunk/xwiki-officeimporter/src/main/java/org/xwiki/officeimporter/OfficeImporterContext.java
> ===================================================================
> ---
> platform/core/trunk/xwiki-officeimporter/src/main/java/org/xwiki/officeimporter/OfficeImporterContext.java
> 2009-01-11 05:09:39 UTC (rev 15300)
> +++
> platform/core/trunk/xwiki-officeimporter/src/main/java/org/xwiki/officeimporter/OfficeImporterContext.java
> 2009-01-11 05:57:24 UTC (rev 15301)
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> import java.util.Map;
>
> import org.xwiki.bridge.DocumentAccessBridge;
> +import org.xwiki.rendering.parser.Syntax;
> +import org.xwiki.rendering.parser.SyntaxType;
>
> import com.artofsolving.jodconverter.DefaultDocumentFormatRegistry;
> import com.artofsolving.jodconverter.DocumentFormat;
> @@ -39,6 +41,11 @@
> public class OfficeImporterContext
> {
> /**
> + * Default document syntax id.
> + */
> + private static final String DEFAULT_SYNTAX_ID = new
> Syntax(SyntaxType.XWIKI, "1.0").toIdString();
Why 1.0? Shouldn't we chose 2.0 as the default?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
