hello,
I'm +1 Le 20 janv. 09 à 18:07, Jean-Vincent Drean a écrit : > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> > wrote: >> -0; read below. >> >> The main problems I see are: >> - The icons are only 16x16. Scaling them does not yield good results. >> - They are not comprehensive. I'm sure there are some icons that we >> need >> and which are not available in there. > > I think that their purpose is not to be self-comprehensive, they > should be used along with text. +1 > > >> So, I'm not against using Silk icons (we already do in some >> places), but >> I don't think we should use it alone. We still need other icons, be >> they from Tango, Crystal or custom made. > > I'm not saying that we should forbid to use icons from other > libraries, just that we should encourage the use of silk for all small > icons by providing them in our webapp. If we don't agree I'll just put > icons for my current needs but I think it's not the best option. +1 small icons can be generic, and used in different skin, or L&F > >> A better idea would be to try to define a guideline L&F, and whenever >> doing an application, try to reuse from the existing icons as much as >> possible, and to add icons from the same set when some icons are >> already >> available. > > We need that too. > On a related topic Laurent and I have started to work on pre-defined > styles (ie: css classes) for usual layout needs (tables, pages lists, > tabs, columns, etc). > See http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Crumbs/Tables for > example. > > JV. > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
