Vincent Massol wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Dan Miron wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>> Regarding the http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2964 issue, this
>> is how I see it:
>> - Grabbing the icons from the silk iconset
>> - Creating a macro called 'icon' with the following parameters:
>> - fileName (required) the name of the file which holds the
>>
>
> I don't like that parameter name. I prefer the more anonymous "name"
>
>
>> icon; here I see two possible approaches:
>> - with (optional)
>> - height (optional)
>>
>
> I don't think we should specify width and height since we're using
> bitmaps. Would be nice to use SVG for sure but 1) the silk icon set is
> not SVG and 2) I don't think ie6 supports SVG out of the box.
>
>
>> An example of usage would be the following:
>> {{icon fileName="arrow_out.gif" with="20" height="20" /}}
>>
>
> I'd prefer:
>
> {{icon name="arrow_out"//}}
>
> Now for easy emoticons usage I think (I'm not sure) that we could use
> a Rendering Transformation instead that would recognize special
> characters (such as :) ) and internally transform them into icon macros.
> However there's a use case I haven't thought about which is that the
> xwiki syntax renderer should probably not use transformed XDOM to
> generate wiki syntax since otherwise that makes Transformations
> persistent. Then there's the question of the WYSIWYG editor... Need to
> think some more about this...
>
> At least you could start implementing the icon macro before we agree
> on the emoticon part.
>
I could go on with {{icon name="arrow_out"//}} but this means that the
extension will be assumed as ".gif" but it offers the advantage that
it's quite intuitive. As for the smileys, we could postpone implementing
them until things become more clear.
On the other hand, this is what Anca says:
-------------------------
Would it be any difference between this macro and the image markup
([[image:reference]] or image:reference), besides the way the image file
resolution (image: looks it up as an attachment whereas the {{icon}} macro
would
getit from the silk icon set) ?
Any way we could make these icons accessible as image: references instead of
building a whole new macro for it, for syntax simplicity?
-------------------------
So what do you think? Should I go ahead with what I proposed above? I'd
say yes, because it's more intuitive than using image:reference.
Tnx,
Dan
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
