Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > Vincent Massol wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Some time ago we agreed that component implementations should be >> located in the internal package. I now believe it's wrong if we want >> to allow users to use our modules separately from the rest of XWiki as >> standard java beans. I think it's a good property to have that users >> can integrate our modules into their own code without taking the whole >> of XWiki. This is what I'm trying to do with the rendering module. >> >> Thus I'm proposing to move the components out of the internal module >> *only* for the rendering module for now even though I suspect that >> we'll want to do that for all modules eventually. >> >> Here's my +1 >> >> > > What's the advantage? Or, what's wrong with keeping the internal > package? Apart from a longer package name, there's no bound semantics on > such a package. IMO it even has the advantage that it clearly delimits > interfaces and abstract base classes from implementations. > > I agree to Sergiu. Keeping the implementation and the specifications separately provides more accuracy to our api.
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
