Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I wrote a POC about document types a while back. Some mockups are
> available [1]. Summary:
> 
>  - Introduce a new property in xwiki classes: class type. 3 different
> class types: document type, document meta, system. More below.
>  - Make defaultViewSheet and defaultEditSheet properties (BaseClass) 
> persistent.
>  - New Document API methods : getViewSheet, getEditSheet. Those
> methods loop over documents objects and resolve the sheet to use.
>  -- On the first object from a "document type" class (Users, Blog
> articles, etc) the sheet to use for this class is returned.
>  -- Document meta / System classes (comments, tags, etc) never trigger
> the use of a sheet.
>  - When viewing/editing a page getViewSheet/getEditSheet is called and
> the returned sheet is used.
>  - If there's no object from a "document type" class in a document,
> "document meta" objects are displayed before or after the content
> (depending on a class property) with their custom viewSheet/editSheet
> or with the default sheet we provide (an improved version of what we
> currenlty have in the object editor).
> 
> If we all agree that this is what we want to handle document types
> then I think the best would be to develop the first part ("document
> types" handling) during 1.9. If we can't develop this in the
> timeframe, adding viewSheet/editSheet properties to XWikiDocument does
> not conflict with the scenario above (they could be the first
> properties checked by Document#get*Sheet). The only issue I foresee is
> that it could make things look more complex when we'll have class
> types and everything. WDYT ?

+1, I reached the same conclusion, and I already started working on 
this. If you also have some code, we should merge efforts.

> [1] : 
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/OverhaulOfXWikiClassesAndObjectsManagement



-- 
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to