Jerome Velociter wrote: > Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> Jerome Velociter wrote: >>> We should decide on which way we want to include our JS/CSS in >>> templates. I'd say only with (js|ss)fx plugin is ok. >>> >> I don't know, this will create a stronger dependency on the plugin. Are >> we 100% sure we want that? >> >> I guess that if a sysadmin decides to remove the js plugins, then he can >> also replace these calls with <script> tags, too, so I don't think that >> this is a severe problem. using jsfx seems better to me, too. > > Also, with jsfx is the order in which the resulting script tags are > written down deterministic ? Is it First In First Out ? If not then it's > probably too dangerous.
It uses a Set interface, which internally is a LinkedHashSet. From the javadoc: "This linked list defines the iteration ordering, which is the order in which elements were inserted into the set (insertion-order). Note that insertion order is not affected if an element is re-inserted into the set." So the order is right. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
