Thomas Mortagne wrote: > Hi devs, > > The real full qualified name of a document is wiki:Space.Page. I think > we sould always use only this form for technical purposes like storing > in database or old API which does not support DocumentName. > > pros: > - don't need to take care of the context, the information is always right. > - if everything is stored in only one form it's way easier to compare > things and do requests > > cons: > - old code which does not support this document name form will fail. > This could hardly be a good arguments since this form is a officially > valid document name but i can't see anything else. > > Among others, the last use case which make me send this proposal is > http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3754. IMO getLinkedPages > return and the link table should only contains fully qualified links, > especially since theses lists are supposed to contains uniques > documents and we need to know the 3 parts of the document name to make > sure of that . Note that a document could contain a link to a document > in another wiki or even a link to the same document but written in its > full form so a code which support only local form is wrong anyway. > > WDYT ?
+1, 1.9 looks like a good place to break the old behaviour. although for a single wiki (non-multiwiki environment) this full form will always be a little too much, since the wiki prefix is redundant. Also, I think the doc.fullName should be consistent with this (ftm it seems to return Space.Page). Happy coding, Anca > > Here is my +1. The pros are basically the same that make us introduce > DocumentName to not manipulate String anymore in code. > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
