Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> Vincent Massol wrote: >>> Since we have moved the module to the core module. >> +1 >> > > Oh, didn't notice that this is about the Jira project... > > Then I'm -1, since Jira should always be a point of reference, even for > historical issues. SVN has its history internally, so we can always see > past commits, and those commits will refer to Jira issues, but since > Jira doesn't have a real history, there will be no way to see all the > details for deleted issues. > > An alternative would be to move the issues to the core project, but it's > not a good one, IMO, since: > - it involves a lot of work to determine the correct version mapping > between the two projects > - release schedules might not overlap entirely, since we released tools > both for increasing 1.x milestones and out-of-order 1.(x-1).z bugfixes > - I don't know how Jira works, so if we do move issues and then delete > the project, I'm not sure redirects will continue to work. > > So, I propose to leave the project in place, and remove permissions so > that nobody can create new issues in it. > > I think that there is a way to display a custom header for that project, > to let people know it is deprecated.
+1 if possible. Thanks, Marius _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
