On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 21:41, Asiri
Rathnayake<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think we should protect java macros from wiki macros. Someone
>> with programming right is supposed to know enough to take care of what
>> he's doing. It's even a feature for me to be able to customize any
>> macro even the java ones from the wiki. If it's really needed you
>> could have an option for protecting java macros but i really think
>> it's not necessary.
>
>
> There is a small problem with redefining java macros: the newly defined wiki
> macro will not be able to access the old java macro if it wants to act like
> a decorator for example. I mean If I define a wiki macro named "box" i will
> be overriding the original box macro and if I try to refer the original box
> macro within my newly defined wiki macro, I would create an infinite loop
> instead. We have to prohibit defining recursive wiki macros (wiki macro
> referring itself would create loops). Even though this could be overcome by
> using parameters appropriately, I think its too dangerous. WDYT?
>
> (PS: I haven't tested a recursive wiki macro yet, can't wait to see what
> happens)

Protect from infinite look is MacroTransformation job, it does not
have anything to do with wiki macros.

When i said customize i was not thinking of decoration but a rewrite.
Note that a macro written in groovy for example could still use
directly java macro class even it's not very clean when the has some
@Requirement but still possible. Most of the complex macros take care
of being modular as much as possible with sub components or just
classes so customize such a java maro and reusing sub component/class
would no be very difficult.

Anyway I still don't see reason to forbid overwrite java macros.

>
> Thanks.
>
> - Asiri
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to