Hi! Pascal Voitot wrote: > things like workflow engines such as jBPM, Bonita or even if we are crazier, > BPEL (I don't see why we could use BPEL here but I really think this is the > example of a technology that :) )... I don't say these engines are really > bad but they are too much complicated, too much theoretic, too heavy for a > simple workflow... > >
Thanks. I've been taking a look at Bonita and can, more or less, understand what do you mean. Thus, another doubt, why do these workflow engines exist? I mean, what is the difference between the workflows we are speaking about and those jBPM, Bonita or whatever engine you could know must face? Are they in an alternative path or have these engines unnecessary complexity? Thanks for your thoughts! Ricardo -- Ricardo RodrÃguez Your EPEC Network ICT Team _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
