On Aug 10, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Andreas Schaefer wrote: > Hi Vicent > > Great news. I am going to update my source and try it out right > away. That said I was wondering how difficult it would be to > backport that to 1.9.2. I am running the Blog 2.0 upgrade on my > regular blog and one eye sore is the RSS feed. I would love to patch > the fix to the 1.9.2 source, compile it and patch my server with it. > If you could tell me what classes are involved I would diff them and > try to apply it.
It's hard. I did a big refactoring to implement this cleanly (Renderers are now components and thus can be added dynamically for example). The easiest is really if you can upgrade your install on XE 2.0M3 (latest trunk). FYI 2.0M3 should be released tomorrow (if all goes fine). We'd also love to get feedback on 2.0M3 (or latest trunk). We think it's pretty stable and nice but someone using it for real would be great to verify all is fine before the final release. You'd also wiki macros btw (amongst other things) ;) Thanks -Vincent > Thanks > > Andreas Schaefer > > On Saturday, August 08, 2009, at 04:59AM, "Vincent Massol" > <[email protected] > > wrote: >> >> On Aug 8, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >> [snipped because I'm only answering to the question below] >> >>> Fortunately, Vincent just committed a renderer that does not print >>> these >>> markers anymore, so even the original solution of using plain >>> velocity >>> to render the feed would work. >>> >>> Vincent, is this XHTML renderer used by default now? >> >> yes. It's the XHTML Renderer for the "xhtml/1.0" syntax. If you want >> annotated XHTML you need to ask for the renderer for the >> "annotatedxhtml/1.0" syntax (which is used only by the wysiwyg editor >> right now). >> >> -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
