Hi, On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
> [Ricardo Rodriguez] Your EPEC Network ICT Team wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Ecaterina Valica wrote: > >> Meaning for links color: > >> > >> Proposal 1. having separate links color: > >> > >> - dark grey for internal links + JS > > What do you mean by "+ JS"? > > >> - blue for external links > >> > >> > >> Proposal 2. having blue for every thing that you can interact with. > >> > >> > > > > Just in case the opinion of a simple user could be taken into account: > > option 2 is OK for me. For a regular user is enough to be aware of what > > elements of a page she/he could interact with without receiving extra > > information about the details of such an interaction. > > Normally external links are identified by an icon, not by color. Having > links using almost the same color as the text is not a good idea, and > having links with two different colors in the same context is confusing. > I like contentLinks2.png best too. I agree with Sergiu on keeping the same color for all links + having the number of comments / attachments is nice too. Guillaume > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Guillaume Lerouge Product Manager - XWiki Skype: wikibc Twitter: glerouge http://guillaumelerouge.com/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
