Thomas Mortagne wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:02, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 20:37, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Vincent Massol wrote: >>>>> Note: It's important to write somewhere clearly that Xlet projects >>>>> are >>>>> not done by the xwiki dev team and not supported by the xwiki dev >>>>> team >>>>> (and thus that the quality depends on the contributor(s)). >>>>> >>>>> It could also be mentioned that at some point an Xlet project >>>>> could be >>>>> elected to become a platform project if the interest is generic, if >>>>> it's voted and if the quality is good enough. >>>> I agree. I think the best place for that would be a page on >>>> code.xwiki.org. >>>> >>>> I don't think we need a new wiki for the forge (except technically >>>> - for >>>> SVN), I would be to aggregate all info that concern contrib in >>>> code.xwiki.org since they are closely related. >>>> >>>> BTW I forgot to mention in the original email, I think we should >>>> propose >>>> a generic maven groupId for individuals or projects that don't want >>>> to >>>> come up with their own. Something like "org.xwiki.contrib". >>> all projects are supposed to have at least a name and generally can >>> use org.xwiki.myproject I think >> The current rule is org.xwiki.<top level project> so if contrib is a >> top level project it seems logical to have org.xwiki.contrib. > > contrib is a repository of top level projects not a project itself IMO
The problem with "org.xwiki.myproject" is that we lose the "not developed by the XWiki team" aspect that contrib brings. Jerome. > >> -Vincent >> >>>> wdyt ? >>>> >>>> Jerome. >>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -Vincent >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > > > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
