On 10/20/2009 02:16 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote: > Hi, > > > I don't understand why you've used "transient". Can you explain? >> > > Sorry, "mutable servlet field" was not the error. It was "A non-serializable > value is stored into a non-transient field of a serializable class". My > mistake. > > This is why I added the transient field thinking it would fix the problem. > It did fix the problem but I wasn't sure if that is the correct thing to do. > > Thanks.
Why don't you make them static? Instance members of a singleton class is roughly equivalent to static members. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
