they are indeed very similar and with unimportant element additions. IMO they look a bit more colorful, but I'm ok with them.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 16:20, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/02/2009 03:53 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > > Looks nice, posting here in case we need a new icon set at some point: > > http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2009-10-06-n58.html > > > > It looks very nice and has 1000 icons. > > The icon set has a very high overlap with Silk, the current set (there > are a few missing and a few added), and with the same names. This means > that we can easily replace the icon set just by replacing the current > icons with these. Well, there's the problem that we've hardcoded "silk" > everywhere. > > The major advantage of FatCow over Silk is that it also provides 32px > icons. Other than that, IMO they seem to fill better the available > space, meaning that they look slightly bigger, and they look a bit less > childish, although just a bit. > > > P.S.: It's FatCow, not FactCow. > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
