+1.

- Asiri

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Following the initial discussion at
> http://markmail.org/thread/kachlhm3d26g22jb I by this mail throw a vote
> to move on and create the contrib project.
>
> After giving it some more thoughts in a discussion with Vincent, here is
> what I propose :
>
> 1) Create a "contrib" top level project, so create :
> - The "contrib.xwiki.org" wiki with the draft at
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/Contrib-Main-WebHome as
> initial content for it's Main.WebHome
> - List this wiki in the Main.Forge page on www.xwiki.org, and also
> refactor a little this page using the content at
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/Www-Main-Forge (The main
> noticeable difference is the change of wording between "XWiki Products
> and Extensions" to "XWiki [Top Level] Projects", and the fact platform
> now belongs to the list).
> - Create a contrib directory at svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/, with the
> following architecture :
> contrib/
> |__people/
> |__projects/
> |__retired/
> |__sandbox/
>
> *people* will be a directory for "personal tests" projects (such as
> http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/sandbox/xdom/). The idea is behind is
> to give whoever requests it a personal space where he can experiment
> with XWiki code, and that space is private (i.e. an implied rule is that
> people are not supposed to commit code in others projects, thus making
> it different from sandbox projects). Each sub-folder of people/ will be
> composed of the name of the person that requests his project, for
> example "jvelociter".
> *projects* will hosts the actual contrib projects, that are active
> (meaning that they still do make sense as projects in the XWiki
> ecosystem, they are not abandoned, etc.)
> *retired* will be the "place where dead project go ;(" for example
> http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/sandbox/xeclipse-gsoc/ since it's now
> replaced by the XEclipse top level project.
> *sandbox* will be the new place for the current sandbox. We therefore
> propose to move all sandboxed projects here (except for the retired ones
> that will go straight to california).
>
> 2) Create a "XWiki Contribs" JIRA project with projects from "sandbox"
> and "projects" as components. Note that we want to leave open the
> possibility for big projects to have their own JIRA on our installation
> as well. We will move existing issues that are right now correctly
> componentized in the current XSANDBOX  to the new project, and lose the
> other ones (which are a couple of old closed issues AFAIR).
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Please let me know what you think of all this. If we agree I'd like to
> make the move during the week.
>
> Thanks,
> Jerome.
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to