On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote: > Hello all, > > I think it would be nice to have the possibility to post-load some of > the JavaScript extensions, as a way to ease performance best practices > for developers. (See > http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#postload for > example). > > It would also allow people to easily add hungry third party scripts > (like the google analytics tracker) in a non intrusive manner and not > sacrificing performance (no need to modify/override htmlfooter.vm for > example, a simple SX always-use will do). > > I see different ways of doing that : > > 1) Either we say all document JSX are post-loaded, and we move the > hook > down the DOM just before the closing </body> tag. > 2) Either we have 2 hooks and we leave it as an option to be post- > loaded. > > My preference goes to 1), as I don't see any good use case where a > extension would need not to be post-loaded; and 2) is not so elegant > to > implement with the current SX mecanism.
1) sounds good to me too but I'm not an expert (so I don't know if there are any drawbacks). Thanks -Vincent > > WDYT ? > > (Note: I'm not talking about file-system extensions here (JSFX), > though > the question could be asked for them as well - I need to give it more > thoughts) > > Jerome. _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
