On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:26, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
>
>> On 11/25/09 10:11 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
>>> On 11/24/09 7:07 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>>>> On 11/23/2009 10:43 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I just found that we have a "ajax" URL parameter already. It's
>>>>>> put in
>>>>>> the context in XWikiAction so we could check for it in statistics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT about reusing it ?
>>>>>
>>>>> What is this URL param doing? The name doesn't sound very
>>>>> explicit to
>>>>> tell not to log stats...
>>>>
>>>> Currently it prevents in some cases returning the full response. For
>>>> example, the /cancel/ action normally redirects to view, which in
>>>> turn
>>>> renders the entire page. An AJAX request just wants to trigger the
>>>> cancel action, and doesn't care for the response at all. Not going
>>>> through the rendering engine is a good performance boost.
>>>>
>>>> It's not used for every request done through AJAX, since it must be
>>>> added manually.
>>>
>>> In the long run, I don't like too much this solution, since it forces
>>> developers to be aware of that and to add the ajax=1 to all their
>>> AJAX
>>> requests. Using a different action for service like /service/
>>>
>>> Jerome
>>>
>>> sounds more natural, and easier to learn.
>>
>> Read:
>>
>> "Using a different action for service like /service/sounds more
>> natural,
>> and easier to learn.
>
> "service" doesn't mean much IMO  but +1 for a different action on the
> longer run. Note that WCAG complains about URL with query string (for
> readability reason) so this solves this problem too.

Adding an action is not that difficult if everyone is agree to go the
action way now...

>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> Jerome"
>>
>>>>
>>>>> I think I'd prefer a more explicit param.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:04, Thomas Mortagne
>>>>>> <[email protected]>    wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:36, Vincent Massol<[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Nov 19, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:50, Vincent Massol<[email protected]
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 18, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Since we introduce document footer informations view
>>>>>>>>>>> statistics
>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>> store several time for the same user view of a page.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> See http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4590
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The issue is that theses tabs are loaded asynchronously in
>>>>>>>>>>> ajax
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> make a call using view action.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Here are some solutions:
>>>>>>>>>>> 1/ introduce a new action "viewinternal", "service" or
>>>>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>>>>>> that would be a "view" action without UI and not taken into
>>>>>>>>>>> account by
>>>>>>>>>>> statistics (that register for "view" action events)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +0
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2/ pretty much the same thing that 1/ but based on a URL
>>>>>>>>>>> parameter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is much better to me since:
>>>>>>>>>> * Stats are a transersval concern, not related to the view
>>>>>>>>>> action
>>>>>>>>>> especially. I'm pretty sure we can imagine use cases where we
>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>> want to register stats for actions other than view
>>>>>>>>>> * The way I'd like to implement the actions later on (xwiki-
>>>>>>>>>> actions
>>>>>>>>>> module) is to have action pipelines and this "saving stats"
>>>>>>>>>> action
>>>>>>>>>> will be implemented as a post-action that would be injected
>>>>>>>>>> after the
>>>>>>>>>> main actions. Thus only this post action will need to check
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> parameter which will be transparent to the other actions, thus
>>>>>>>>>> providing a good separation of concern.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you want statistics module to go look at URL parameters ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I said the opposite actually: it's the action that should do
>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>> Right now (current code) we could just have the view action
>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> the param.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And do what, put something in the context ? The statistics module
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> still receive a "view" action event. It has to check something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How would
>>>>>>>>> you name this parameter ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some proposals:
>>>>>>>> - "stats=true|false" (or 0|1 to follow the current "tradition")
>>>>>>>> - "logstats"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also i really don't like that ajax calls use the standard view
>>>>>>>>> action
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you explain? I don't see the problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "view" action is supposed to be a user view of a document, ajax
>>>>>>> calls
>>>>>>> are retrieving structured informations from a service located
>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>> page most of the time so they have to explicitly tweak the URL to
>>>>>>> remove the UI, indicate they want plain renderer... and so get
>>>>>>> something that has nothing to do with what "view" action is
>>>>>>> supposed
>>>>>>> to be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so the "viewinternal" action is needed anyway IMO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 3/ use an additional AJAX request similar to a google
>>>>>>>>>>> analytics
>>>>>>>>>>> call
>>>>>>>>>>> to record statistics
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As i said in jira I'm against 3/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2/ seems too big for a URL parameter to me and it makes
>>>>>>>>>>> statistics
>>>>>>>>>>> depends on URL parameters where 1/ fix the issue without
>>>>>>>>>>> touching
>>>>>>>>>>> anything in the statistics module
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for 1/
>>>>>>>>>>> +0 for 2/
>>>>>>>>>>> -1 for 3/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas Mortagne
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to