On Nov 27, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Florin Ciubotaru wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, the interface is not used required any more, but I find it useful > for the fact that it's more like an specification for the xml-rpc API > and it's better placed for this purpose, in the xml-rpc model as opposed > the > implementation which is in the old core. It's also easier to navigate > then XWikiXmlRpcApiImpl. Like any interface, it might be useful in the > future if we change the implemetation. > Not sure what the balance is on removing it vs keeping it. > +0 > I think that's redudant because we also have a Client (http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/platform/core/trunk/xwiki-xmlrpc/xwiki-xmlrpc-client/src/main/java/org/xwiki/xmlrpc/XWikiXmlRpcClient.java) which also exposes the same API, using the actual model class for the return types (which is more clear).
And anyway in the XMLRPC properties file (http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/resources/org/apache/xmlrpc/webserver/XmlRpcServlet.properties) you specify directly the implementation. I agree though, that it can be seen as a specification. I still tend to +1 for removing it, but let's wait for what the others will say. Thanks, -Fabio _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
