On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Fabio Mancinelli > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Nov 30, 2009, at 3:08 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >>> >>> Why do you pass the component manager around? Each component >>> implementation can declare a dependency on ComponentManager if it needs it. >>> >>>> + String execute(ComponentManager componentManager, String... >>>> arguments) throws Exception; >>>> +} >>> >> Right. >> It's a leftover because before I wasn't implementing commands as components. > > Even if you're not using Components, passing the CM is still an > implementation details that should not be shown in a user-API > signature. If you're not using Components you'd pass it in the > constructor of your command. > Yes. Thank you for the remark Vincent.
-Fabio _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
