Hi,
> Some corrections after discussing with Asiri: > - it seems what Asiri is proposing is a Velocity API, ie for usage of > the importer from velocity, not from Java > I was actually proposing a java API but now I understand that it's not correct. I already have different components responsible for carrying out the tasks these proposed methods are supposed to do. So I will simply add these proposed methods to office importer velocity API instead (won't take more than a couple of hours). Although I would have to change DocumentName parameters to string parameters in velocity API and convert those string parameters to DocumentName instances when invoking corresponding components. Also, I will create a small module document explaining the internals of officeimporter module on code.xwiki.org so that we can discuss whether we want to improve the officeimporter module further. Thanks. - Asiri _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
