Hi Thomas,
> > May be we can avoid the enum type by using generics? > > > > <T extends EntityReference> T getCurrentEntityReference(); > > > > Not sure if this is a good practice though. > > Generic does not exist in the bytecode so impossible to know that you > want the EntityType.WIKI if you don't explicitly ask for it. > Right. Inside the method we'd have no clue what the client code is requesting. Would be cool if we can somehow not depend on the EntityReference implementation type within the getCurrentEntityReference() method (thereby not having to know which type the user wants but just cast and return what is available). But I don't know if this is possible, and this would still mean having to do an unsafe cast like: EntityReference ref = ....; return (T) ref; which is also not that good. Thanks. - Asiri > > > > > - Asiri > > > > > > > > > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Vincent > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devs mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
