Le 12-janv.-10 à 11:13, Thomas Mortagne a écrit : >> Should this Plugin remain standalone or added as another goal to >> the XAR plugin ?
I licensing is appropriate (all LGPL right) I would vote for a xar plugin extension. What do the XAR plugin writers think? >> The plugin can be seen as a preparation step for XAR plugin where >> the content is kept separate from XML file so that IDEs language >> support can be used. >> >> BTW I am just wondering why the default export (Admin -> Export) is >> exporting the content XML encoded and not within a CDATA construct. >> A CDATA construct would make the content or code easier to read but >> it would prevent the user from using "]]>" within the content. > > I think the first reason would be that the code is using a XML writer > and let it handle escaping the way it want and did not tough a lot > about that. Also if CDATA make impossible to put any data (are you > sure ?) it would be a blocker for me anyway. why not the following: - if the content contains ]]> use the normal procedure - if the content does not (99% of the cases) use a CDATA XML-wise it's equivalent. paul _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
