Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> On 02/09/2010 11:08 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think viewheader.vm is not used anymore. I couldn't find any reference of
>> it in other vm nor in skins.
>>
>> However it's still referenced from XWiki.java, in getSkinClass() (and from
>> ApplicationResources*.properties files):
>>
>> needsUpdate |= bclass.addTemplateField("viewheader.vm", "View
>> Header");
>>
>> But I think this field is now not only useless but even misleading since
>> filling it will have no effect AFAIK.
>>
>> Could someone confirm this? Does it mean people with custom skin will find
>> their skin not working anymore?
>>
>> Anyone knows when viewheader.vm was stopped to be used because AFAICS this
>> will break all existing custom skins?
>
> I think Dodo was the last (and only) skin that used it.
>
>> What new properties should we add to the XWikiSkins class?
>
> None. Personally I'd like to completely refactor the skin class, so that
> it only contains a name, a description, a parent skin, and a filesystem
> directory name. Everything else should be either in its own object (a
> generic SkinResource with 'name' and 'content'), or as an attachment.
>
> Currently I prefer to work with attachments, that I can access via
> WebDAV and edit in the system editor.
What about templates with underscore in their names (e.g.
textarea_wysiwyg.vm)? I recently tried to overwrite such a template by
attaching a modified version to the skin page but the underscore was
removed from the attachment's name..
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
