On Mar 3, 2010, at 8:05 AM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: > +1 > I wonder if javascript can be disabled programmatically, that would > be very cool.
If you want to test some functional tests without JS, it's easy to do by using for example the HtmlUnit driver (which has JS off by default). Thanks -Vincent > I just finished a selenium 1.0 comment test I'd like to slip through > the closing door if I can. > > Caleb > > Vincent Massol wrote: >> Hi devs, >> >> Jerome and I have explored using Selenium2 (see >> http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/cqbxdmhqdi36kovn) >> >> The code is in >> http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/sandbox/webdriver-ui-tests/ >> >> I'd like to propose to: >> >> * Move the code in >> http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/enterprise/trunk/distribution-test/ui-tests >> * Agree that from now on *new* UI functional tests are written using >> Selenium2 >> * Slowly migrate current functional tests over time (I have almost finished >> migrating the login/logout tests for ex) >> * Use the PageObject pattern as shown in the existing tests in >> http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/enterprise/trunk/distribution-test/ui-tests >> >> The pros to use selenium2 are those listed in >> http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/cqbxdmhqdi36kovn: >> >> * No more JS sandbox. In selenium1 all the selenium API is executed as JS in >> the browser. In Selenium2 the browsers are controlled using their native >> APIs (JNA). >> * Faster (as a consequence of the previous point) >> * Allows to do stuff such as file uploads, etc since there's no longer the >> issue of the JS sandbox >> * No need to start a Selenium Proxy. All you need is to start XE and then >> you can run the tests as simple JUnit tests. >> * The API is much cleaner (this is to be expected with hindsight). See >> http://seleniumhq.org/docs/09_webdriver.html >> * There's a very fast executing HtmlUnit driver (not to be used with tests >> using JS though since it emulates browser JS support and thus cannot >> guarantee the result in the real browser) >> >> Caveat: >> >> * Selenium2 is still quite young so it's possible that there are cases when >> it'll have bugs or be instable. We should still allow using selenium1 tests >> when this happens. >> >> Note: I have configured hudson to run the selenium2 tests from the sandbox >> to see how stable it is. >> >> Here's my +1 >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
