On 9 Mar 2010, at 20:40, Story Henry wrote: > A very basic implementation of foaf+ssl is up here: > > http://webid.myxwiki.org/
While fixing Chrome [0], we found a bug with my previous implementation of webid.myxwiki.org, that made any services using http://foafssl.org/srv/idp unable to login users. Luckily Damian Steer, the author of the Java RDFa library [1] we are using, was here to help me out of this. He found that the cause of the problem was the invalid XHTML I had written on the xwiki homepages. I had placed a <div> inside a table, which the java html5 parsers - which the rdfa parser feeds on - saw as an error, and corrected in such a way as to make the RDFa graph invalid. I now replaced this with a <tbody> and it works fine. This goes to show the importance of validating ones XHTML early. Validating XHTML, which is much cleaner than html, is going to be much easier, than working out the details that html5 parsers have to deal with. Of course when popping something in a validator it helps to do the work correctly. It's easier to test for 0 bugs, than to decide which ones are legitimate and which ones not. So for XHTML+RDFa development, it would help if one could put the following at the top of the document <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd";> Then the rdfa tags would no longer be flagged by http://validator.w3.org/ What is the best way to do this in XWiki? Henry PS. If you had trouble logging into http://foaf.me or http://nanoblog.me/ previously, try again. It should work now. [0] http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=37765 [1] http://github.com/shellac/java-rdfa _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
