Hi Sergiu,

On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

> On 03/16/2010 10:51 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Vincent Massol<vinc...@massol.net>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> I'd like to move this topic forward. Thus I've now created a draft of the
>>> XWiki.org Governance that gathers what I had proposed at
>>> http://markmail.org/message/fxqvprtbb5vyog6g
>>> 
>>> The Governance page is currently at:
>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/Governance
>>> 
>> 
>> Sounds good overall. As one could expect, the 2 gray areas to me are:
>> 
>> "The notion of active is currently left to the appreciation of the XWiki
>> Committers."
> 
> Well, it is a little bit more clear in the Committership page:
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/Committership :
> - becoming a committer once "enough" good patches are applied
> - becoming emeritus if a whole year passes without a commit
> 
>> and
>> "Right now the definition of contribution level is not strictly defined"
>> 
>> I would be ok to go ahead without those 2 specified more closely but I'd be
>> in favor of defining at least a loose metric or some indicators that would
>> be publicly displayed somewhere so that anyone could come and see for
>> himself, "this is where most commits come from". Some kind of public
>> dashboard maybe, similar to the one we have at:
>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ProjectHealth
>> but updated in real time with the names of the committers&  their number of
>> commits - if that's doable of course.
> 
> This would be really easy to do with JGit reading a Git clone of our SVN 
> repo + charting macro.
> 
>> WDYT?
>> 
>> Guillaume
>> 
>> 
>>> Please review it and vote. The idea is then to move it to
>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance in a few days.
> 
> "or with a "Products" tab in some top level horizontal navigation" => I 
> don't quite like it. How many products do we have? IMO, not many enough 
> to require a top level entry. But I agree with the Download page.

We have only "Projects" and yes I think we want to be a forge. We have several 
projects:
- XE
- standalone rendering
- standalone wysiwyg
- XEclipse
- XOO
- XOffice
- apps could also be considered projects (xwatch app, xem app, etc) - to be 
decided.

Products would be commercial offerings only, a la JBoss. See http://jboss.org

I'm also not sure we want this now but I wanted to leave the door open for the 
future. We could decide to remove it for now and rediscuss it later if the need 
arises.

> "we require that the company/individual have at least one active 
> Committer" => How about companies that invest a lot of money in *our* 
> developers, sponsoring important, major features, like the Office 
> importer, or the social dashboard? Or is the Supporters page enough for 
> them?

I think so. Most of these companies are not selling services/packages on top of 
XWiki anyway so they couldn't go in that page.

> "The notion of active is currently left to the appreciation of the XWiki 
> Committers." => Why does a company have to be active continuously?

IMO for 2 reasons:
1) To show that it knows what it talks about and to ensure a good quality of 
knowledge?
2) To ensure that companies don't do a push to get a committer in to get listed 
and then that committer doesn't do any work thereafter

But yes maybe the same rule as we have for committers is good enough (i.e. 1 
year).

> I would like to see stated somewhere (not necessarily on this page) that 
> most committers are from XWiki SAS not because XWiki SAS pushes its 
> employees as committers, but the other way around, because XWiki SAS 
> wants to sustain the best contributors by offering them a job, so it 
> pulls employees from the committers (or promising contributors, future 
> committers).

I agree that on the Hall Of Fame page, we should have a column stating what 
company the person is from.

Thanks
-Vincent

>>> As usual, non committers don't have binding votes but are still very much
>>> encouraged to give their opinions. Their voice is especially more important
>>> on this topic since most committers are from XWiki SAS and thus I feel we
>>> need at least a general agreement from the community at large before doing
>>> anything.
> 
> -- 
> Sergiu Dumitriu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to