Hi XWikiers,

I like 12B and 12E.

I like 15, which to me is probably the most distinctive of all the logos
presented. I also like the fact that one can read a X, a W, a i and a K in
that little guy's shape :-) I think the "-" should be removed between the
"X" and "Wiki" and that the case should be switched from "X-WIKI" to "XWiki"
but that's minor. In short, probably my favorite one.

I have an issue with 16 -> I showed it to a couple friends and they were
unable to read it as "XWiki". I kinda like it but I already know it's
supposed to mean "XWiki" but I'm afraid it's not readable enough for other
people.

I also like 19 (the two-colors version, not the 3D shaped one). I also
happened to see a version of 19 with a font that made it look nicer -> JV,
do you think that version could be added to the page?

Guillaume

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Emilie Ogez <[email protected]> wrote:

> My favorite is also 15.
>
>
> Denis Gervalle a écrit :
> > My favorite is 15.
> >
> > * nice work done for 15 but i find the logo too similar to Atlassian
> >
> >> logo (any basic human based logo would look too Atlassiannish to me i
> >> think)
> >>
> >
> >
> > I strongly disagree that just because it represent a people, it is
> Atlassian
> > like, they do not hold the exclusivity of people logos.
> > Atlasian logo is like a weight-lifter that lift the world, very straight
> on
> > its foot. Nothing to do with a happy jumping man, using really curved
> shape
> > at all !
> >
> > XWiki is about peoples sharing information and compare to most other
> logo,
> > 15 is one that have the most interesting evocation.
> > Without dash, in red or another color, avoiding blue (even if I like it)
> and
> > probably using a more curved font to improve, if needed, the clear
> > difference it have with the Atlassian logo.
> > I would be curious to see what Vishal could propose with some more work.
> >
> > 19 would be my second choice, since it is curved, and even nice straight
> > logo like 7, 8 or 16 evoke to me some inflexibility or technicality,
> which
> > is frightening.
> >
> > 12 could be interesting as a continuation on the initial theme, but it
> would
> > be less distinctive with XWiki.com, probably a nice evolution for them
> not
> > for the open-source one.
> >
> > 1, 2 and 13 are not scaling. 17 is nice, but not scaling and evocation is
> > inappropriate. Appart for not being easy to scale, I feel 4 is not
> readable
> > for newcomers, using only 2 pencils, could probably helps there.
> >
> > Many thanks to all designers anyway for their proposal and please do not
> > feel hurt by my remarks that I really hope to be constructive.
> >
> > Denis
> > _______________________________________________
> > users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge
http://guillaumelerouge.com/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to