On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:09, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Apr 16, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
>
> > +1, with 2 remarks:
> > - do you allow setting locally in XWikiPreferences, so that XWiki farm
> are
> > not globally constrained ?
>
> No. This is a backward compat thing since we don't want to manager titles
> this way in the near future.


Sure, but not taking from XWikiPreference has big impact on farms. I have
the same issue with the previous compat settings, I have to live with only
one options for all my clients, which is obviously not easy to maintain.


> We'll need to revive this thread BTW. The latest discussion I had with
> Jean-Vincent and Thomas (AFAIR) was to make the title field a textarea (but
> only 1 line displayed by default) so that we could put scripts in it. And to
> make it evaluated like the content, not just by old Rendering Interpreters.


Yes, if you don't, I will anyway revive a thread about title. There is a
major issue imposing title at the top of the document for at least 2
reasons:
 - site that have been built with the previous case are not always properly
fixed by the current removal of doubles, since there may be editorial reason
for a difference in the title texts
 - automated page suffer of this, since the content of the title may depends
on a lot of script logic in the page, see ResetPasswordComplete for a simple
XWiki exemple, and imagine what it does on more complex applicative site.

So, yes, there is many improvement to put in for this. I am currently
migrating sites from 1.9 to 2.2 and titles are my main issues. I had to use
"display:none" style for some, waiting for something better !

Denis


>


> > - do you allow 0 to disable searching title in content ?
>
> I hadn't thought about this but yes, that should work fine actually (since
> H0 doesn't exist) :)
>
> Thanks
> -VincentDenis
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 07:47, Asiri Rathnayake
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> We've had a user request (Ludovic as a user ;)) to have a config option
> >> to
> >>> decide the header level to consider for a title.
> >>>
> >>> Right now we consider only levels 1 and 2 when computing a title from
> the
> >>> doc content.
> >>>
> >>> Thus I'm going to add a config option named xwiki.title.headerdepth and
> >>> with a default value of 2 (to have the same behavior as now) and use it
> >> in
> >>> XWikiDocument.getRenderedContentTitle().
> >>>
> >>> Note that this is only for the 2.0 syntax (since it's too hard to do
> for
> >>> syntax 1.0 and we're not supposed to bring changes to the 1.0 syntax).
> >>>
> >>> Please shout quickly if you're against this.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> -Vincent
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> devs mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devs mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Denis Gervalle
> > SOFTEC sa - CEO
> > eGuilde sarl - CTO
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to