On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 18:51, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/28/2010 06:42 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 17:23, Sergiu Dumitriu<[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 04/28/2010 05:17 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 16:44, Ecaterina Valica<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Please provide feedback for the Selective Export UI: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/MultiExportProposal >>>>> >>>>> PS. The HTML+CSS is not final and it's tested only in Firefox. It will be >>>>> improved if it gets positive feedback. >>>>> If it doesn't display correctly, please use the IMG to visualize. >> >> Very nice ! >> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I like it a lot. I only have one outstanding question: what happens for a >>>> space with 1000+ documents in it? How does the UI scale? >>>> >>>> I'm asking because given the current implementation of our treeview I know >>>> that this can be a huge PITA. >>> >>> We're NOT going to use the current treeview, no way. >> >> If the current treeview is not good enough it should be improved >> instead of having several. > > The current one is the one from SmartGWT, which is an external library, > hard to patch locally. Improving it would mean contributing to this > huge, very generic library, wait for approval, release, integration. I'd > rather write a clean/lean one from scratch, which would support what we > need.
I don't really care what is the implementation behind the scene. If the solution is to stop using SmartGWT then lets stop using it. All i'm saying is that there should be only one XWiki treeview. > >>> >>>> Guillaume >>> > > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
