Hi, >> > > Why not use the opportunity to export to DOC instead/in addition of RTF. > > It would be only support the DOC export param and add/replace one menu > > to show DOC. > > > > We used RTF only because FOP only did RTF while what we really want is > DOC > > > > Ludovic > > Supporting .doc is a bit, well, late. I'm saying this because .docx > should be the new and improved version, so a more relevant format would > be .docx (Office Open XML). However, even Microsoft recognized that > OOXML lost the battle with ODF, and the future format which will be > supported by most tools seems to be ODF. > We don't have to choose one. If we provide one format via OOo then we can provide all popular formats(pdf, doc, docx, odf). The cost of exporting extra formats is quite low.
Thanks, Florin Ciubotaru > > And, in addition, .doc is a binary, proprietary and secret format, and > we try to encourage open and/or standard formats. > > Yet, a large share of XWiki users are still using older versions of the > MS Office suite, which makes .doc almost mandatory... > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
