----- "Fabio Mancinelli" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 05:46 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote: > > Hi Fabio, > > > > This means I am iterating and I gather feedback and depending on > that > > feedback we must agree on a version. > > > Ok. I thought that "old" meant "superseded by" :) > > > On a wiki platform, what do you think is more relevant: the user or > page > > centric approach? > > What are the things that make this version (the page centric one) > not to fit > > the Wiki 3.0 specification? > > > What is missing basically boils down to the "Share your thoughts" box Yes, user updates should be mixed in the stream ultimately, I think. > > and the type of information we can convey with it. > > The "user centric" view, imho, is also useful because a "user" could > also be an application that sends events (e.g., meeting or deadlines > reminders, etc.) that can be shown in a more natural way in a user > centric view. Basically even applications might share their thoughts > through the activity stream ;) I completely agree with the last sentence. BUT I think it's not incompatible with a document/user mixed-approched (I don't think either full document-centric or full user-centric can embrace the versatility of XWiki) I see two types of entries : * Document updates. Basically what is currently in latest proposal (though I would add little user pictures here as well, even before the click). This is KM, collaboration, etc. * Users/applications updates. Those are less structured, more a-la facebook. I see something like http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/ActivityStreamMixed (raw picture, would have to be refined) (Note I also have right-padded a bit more the comment/annotation/pencil/etc icons that are on top of user photos, I think they were a bit too masked by them) Jerome. > > > Jerome missed the avatars, so if you did too, please try to expand > the items > > in the prototype (when you hover the items an arrow appears in the > right > > part suggesting that the item can be expanded ). > > > Yes I missed them too, but then I saw it. > Still the previously mentioned types of information are not available > > anymore. > > Thanks, > Fabio > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
