+1 for starting now.

In the future we night consider adding a way for the application to
request validation, that way some can be protected, others
unprotected, but none broken.

Caleb

Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> On 09/10/2010 01:54 AM, Alex Busenius wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>>
>> I've been working on a CSRF protection mechanism for quite some time.
>> It is based on so called secret tokens (also called nonces) that are
>> included into forms and links and checked on server side.  The
>> implementation allows to resubmit a failed request (e.g. in case the
>> user is logged out in the meanwhile), so that the data is not lost in
>> case of bugs.
>>
>> JIRA issue:
>>    http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4873
>> Component implementation:
>>    http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/sandbox/xwiki-csrftoken/
>> Old proposal:
>>    http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/2010-March/017727.html
>>
>>
>> I think it is time to move the CSRF component to the main repository and
>> start using it everywhere.  The protection will be disabled by default
>> until all bugs are fixed.
>>
>> The steps to do would be:
>>
>> 1. Move CSRF token component to platform
>> 2. Fix all templates to use CSRF tokens
>> 3. Fix all applications to use CSRF tokens
>> 4. Fix all actions to check CSRF tokens
>> 5. Fix all integration tests to work with enabled CSRF protection
>>
>> I have patches for steps 2-4, but NOT for 5. Many (about 30-40 last time
>> I counted) integration tests still fail with enabled CSRF protection,
>> because they (mis)use CSRF to set up tests (edit/create pages).
>>
>> Here is my +1
> 
> +1, we'll fix tests as we go.
> 
> Step 3 is very problematic, since "all" applications is not well 
> defined. We can easily fix all the applications included in XE, we might 
> fix some of the applications on code.xwiki.org, but we can't fix user 
> code. So, we need very good documentation, big warnings in the release 
> notes, etc.
> 

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to