On Oct 19, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:

> On 10/19/2010 07:57 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>> 
>> I'd like to propose 3 things:
>> 
>> 1) Add support for symbols/emoticons using our new system in XWiki Syntax 
>> 2.1, i.e.
>> 
>> image:symbol:<symbol name>
>> 
> 
>> Another possibility is: image:icon:<icon name>
> 
> +1 for icon scheme
> 
>> 
>> ex: image:symbol:success (for the success symbol)
>> 
>> 2) Use the existing silk icon library and be able to reference all icons 
>> using their file names as the symbol name.
> 
> I'm -0 for file name. As you say below, I think generic names 
> independent from the underlying icon library are better.

Just to be clear: when I said file name I meant file name without the extension 
of course.

Thanks
-Vincent

>> For ex, image:symbol:thumb_up
>> 
> 
>> 3) Modify the Box macro to accept a ResourceReference as its image parameter 
>> so that all valid image resource references can be specified (including the 
>> new symbol/icon scheme).
> 
> +1
> 
>> 
>> WDYT?
>> 
>> This will solve the emoticon/symbol need + the generic way of adding a box 
>> with any symbol.
>> 
>> Open questions:
>> A) Do we need to handle icon size? If so, how? (answer: with an image 
>> parameter)
>> B) Do we want to expose all silk icons? What if we use another library later 
>> on, will we be able to support all existing silk symbols? Thus, do we need 
>> to pick a subset and settle on names independent from the underlying library?
>> 
> 
>> For A) IMO we don't need it now and we can always use an image param later 
>> on if need be.
>> For B) I'm tempted to think that a set of well-known symbols independent 
>> from the underlying library is better (but more work since we need to define 
>> that set and the names).
> 
> +1
> 
> Thanks,
> Marius
> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to