On Nov 15, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > On 11/15/2010 11:06 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >> >> On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >>> On 11/15/2010 09:35 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>> Now that we've agreed to have major release cycles we need to define what >>>> we do for the current cycle >>>> (see >>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DevelopmentPractices#HReleaseCyclesandReleaseStrategy). >>>> >>>> I'm proposing here to make XE 2.7 the last minor release of the 2.x cycle. >>>> >>>> Here's my +1 >>> >>> 0. I can't decide before I know what the quality is going to be. >> >> Does it mean you don't agree with the voted Release Cycle strategy since >> it's time-based an not "quality"-based? > > No, it means that the strategy does allow for one or more extra releases > if the cycle is not stable enough.
BTW this is not true. It's not what was voted. Also please remember that in what we voted, stability about bugs is achieved through RCs not through the number of minor releases. Thanks -Vincent > Let's say that I'm +1 for *trying* to > make 2.7 the last release, but until we release it, we can't know if > we'll find ten major bugs that we can't fix in the allocated one month > period. One such example is the fact that the new recent activity > implementation doesn't work in virtual wikis. Do you prefer to release a > broken 2.7 and leave it like that? > >> Also if by "quality" you mean bugs then 2.7 will not be the last bug fix >> release of the 2.x cycle; it would be the last minor release only. >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
