On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 14:30, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Nov 16, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >>> On 11/16/2010 12:05 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >>>> I'm amending this proposal to include what I want to do further in the >>>> future. >>>> >>>> My goal is to decrease the quantity of hudson mail while making it easier >>>> to use. >>>> >>>> I would like to start by sending additional mail, one message per day with >>>> an aggregated build >>>> report and run a report which checks for new regressions and send mail >>>> every 10 minutes or so when >>>> there are regressions. >>>> >>>> The second step is to solicit input about the usability of the new >>>> reports. I think seeing reports >>>> in action will make it easier to see what makes a report most useful. This >>>> will be finished when we >>>> are happy with the reports. >>>> >>>> The third step is to remove the existing mail system. I will propose this >>>> step when I think the new >>>> reporting system is satisfactory. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> Caleb >>> >>> +1, it's been months since I haven't read hudson mails. I get hundreds >>> of mails from it each month, that's not normal. >> >> Well, unless we break things frequently and this happens for real... we do >> break stuff frequently... so it's kind of normal we receive lots of emails :) >> >> We can reduce them by: >> - not sending the same email for false positives (we know for example that >> when we have an X server issue it's not a real issue, no space left on >> device, etc We should be able to list these messages and filter them out to >> send them in a different kind of mail, grouped together for ex). > > Yes like an adminsys related mailing list. > >> - not sending emails when the build is successful > > Yep that's pretty useless. > >> - not sending several emails for the same problem > > Depends, maybe resending when it's still not fixed in a week or > another duration we thing is good as "timeout".
I was talking about submodules. When hudson builds a module with submodules, it sends mail for the failed submodule + for the top level module it seems. -Vincent >> -Vincent >> >>>> On 11/15/2010 02:50 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >>>>> I would like to get reports going out so that we can get a feel for the >>>>> periodic reports, and work >>>>> out bugs and make improvements in real time. >>>>> >>>>> I'm +1 to getting reports going. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> A technical challenge is that unless one of the build agents has access >>>>> to a mail relay, it will not >>>>> be able to send mail. If this is a problem, it can be fixed by signing up >>>>> with an email service and >>>>> placing the password in a file on the filesystem of the agent which the >>>>> job is bound to. The file >>>>> can be loaded by the configuration script. >>>>> >>>>> Caleb _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
