Le 23 nov. 2010 à 19:29, Caleb James DeLisle a écrit : >> I would like to suggest you also an svn based storage if that is conceivable >> or at least to leave the space for hooks so that a post-commit xwiki >> "reload-from-directory" and a "post-xwiki-save-commit" are hookable to >> synchronize with whatever you wish. > Well git would be better (better binary compression) but in either case it > would be either bringing > in a large library or depending on an external (non java) application. I'm > not too interested in any > more .war bloat and I'm pretty sure depending on native code is out of the > question.
Leave it open by allowing hooks. I think the interest here is to integrate in existing infrastructure an entreprise already has. svn is one fair leader there. >> I wonder if you don't want, right away, a virtual-file-system so that such >> as an ftp-mount (for some spaces?) is doable. > > There is no reason why anything which could be mounted could not be used. So > nfs, nbd, samba would > definitely work. I'm not familiar with an ftp mount but if it provides a > regular filesystem, it > should make no difference. Well, mounting is a "root-like" operation. Opening a VFS to some server would be something that a configurator of XWiki could be doing. How do you manage version in there? With an attic like in CVS? paul _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
