On Nov 30, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > On 11/30/2010 04:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Denis Gervalle<[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Also agreeing with JV regarding the WYSIWYG source vs Wiki editor confusion, >>> but this is probably another matter since users like me which does not use >>> the WYSIWYG editor do not want to suffer the load of the WYSIWYG editor just >>> to edit the source. >> >> I understand your concern but the WYSIWYG tabs have been implemented >> so that most of the loading (js execution that is) happens when >> switching to the WYSIWYG tab. At least the first implementation was >> working like this. > > The implementation has changed a bit since. Anyway, the JavaScript code > (~500KB) still needs to be evaluated even if the part that is executed > afterwards, when Source is the default tab, is insignificant.
Still we should allow integrators to create a wiki without any wysiwyg editor and only a wiki editor should they want this. If they want to embed a wiki for example in their own application it has to be as lightweight as possible and not having to include any GWT jars will make it lighter. On my side, I still don't like very much at all this source tab since it's confusing and it means we have 2 wiki editors. We need to decide something on this - in another thread.... Who wants to start it? Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
