Hello, On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Thibaut DEVERAUX <[email protected]> wrote: > I love this feature ! > > *Stage wisper, a bit of inspiration for further developments *: > > Will it be possible to use thoose streams as a global wiki's news stream ? > Including comments, followed page modifications, goup exchanges, etc. Like > in Buddypress for example. > http://design-keys.org/activity/ > http://buddypress.org/community/activity/ > * > *Going further, a few time ago during UX workshops we imagined an "all is > manageable within the timeline" way of having regular user interacting with > content. > The use case is simple : it is to be used when the user want to see what is > new today on the network and to comment the new content > - see what new today on the timeline > - interact with content staying into the timeline > - continue reading what's new today on the timeline > Here is the document : > http://www.slideshare.net/thibautdeveraux/design-platform-v2-proposition , > going to "l'atelier" (in french sorry, it is a long time I'm supposed to > make an english version of this concept with enhanced graphics for sharing, > always need more time ^^) > The limit of such system is the javascript amount a page can handle before > becoming to slow. Yet it may give some inspiration. > > * > About the UX of the proposition* : > > I like it, it sounds good as it is keeped simple. > > Maybe a few questions about details : > > 1/ > Is it necessary to add the yesterday, today, title between posts ? > http://screencast.com/t/RJsu44z7bUSG > There is already a "posted xx time ago" and the most immediatly usefull for > the user may be more the last post he have read before than the day it was > posted. > > 2/ > Is there a special reason to have changed the order of the "send, privacy, > references" icones that are used left to right on facebook, to right to left > here ? > Here : http://screencast.com/t/dhpNDfZ1 > Facebook : http://screencast.com/t/Gk2BhGld3 > There is no shame to use the same configuration. ^_^' Being like ergonomics > users are used to is a good thing. > > 3/ > Why is there "140" printed on the top right corner ? > http://screencast.com/t/gOjv4WGe5VVQ > Is it because messages are limited to 140 caracters ? I don't really > understand why there should be such a limitation on wikis that can be used > for project management, where people may have important things to share and > explain ? Also, having text only small boxes is already limitating lengh of > 90% of the messages people naturally enter.
Agreed, we don't need this limitation. We can always shrink long updates client side with some javascript + a expand link. > > 4/ > Why is it always printed "changed status" ? http://screencast.com/t/cBqylv4X > Is status notion is a concept that fit with all the use case of this feature > ? For example what if people are not be thinking they are updating a status, > yet are thinking they are sharing a message with the community ? > Also, the act of seeing a small text right near an other user portrait let > people know this is a message from this persone. This may be enough > information, why specifing ? > The only reason I see for specifing it, is when there is an usage for it. > For example if this is a link to a specific context zone of the wiki where > the action took place. it may be a groupe or the user profile. I agree here too, I prefer the "share message" wording. > > 5/ > About the way items are displayed in a page creation case : > http://screencast.com/t/ue1Ogbd5gf > Why changing the order of message items between a user message case and a > page creation case ? > http://screencast.com/t/oDJij00HEN > I would let's the user read the flow in the same way for each item. Eye > habits. > Example : http://screencast.com/t/nxWatyS9g > > 6/ > Why adding again the information about the message type near the portrait ? > It is already in text and, anyway, I'm not sure the user need it at all. > http://screencast.com/t/9UdhOgB4uR7j > http://screencast.com/t/ACMMR0S15Q > > > Here is a proposal that may be simpler. Of course it depends on the answers > to my question because I can't know evrything about the specifications : > http://screencast.com/t/DNq3MVwLU I don't like too much the "attach" word near to references. I think the icons speak for themselves. Cheers, Jerome. > > Have a nice day > > Thibaut DEVERAUX > Tel : +33 (0)6 75 51 20 80 > [email protected] > http://design-keys.org > [email protected] > http://bricks-studio.com > > > > 2010/11/30 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]> > >> Hi, >> >> Please provide feedback for this User Status proposal: >> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/UserStatusProposal >> >> Other references: >> * Proposal Code: >> >> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/UserStatusPrototype >> * Mail [Investigation] User Statuses: >> http://markmail.org/thread/65j5pc2ymmntujt3 >> >> Thanks, >> Caty >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
