On 01/10/2011 12:49 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote: > +1 also for page, for the same reasons raised by others > > BUT : could we have it as a variable in the admin ? We could imagine > situations where it is important for the user to name it document, and to > name a space as "folder", or "application".
No, this is going to do more harm than good. What do we write in the documentation? Do we make 2-3 sets of screenshots to show the possible display variants? > More : as we have page type management, could we have generic page types > (page, document, code, etc.) with specific icon in the UI ? Same with spaces > (space, project, application, etc.) Valid idea for the future. > > > Le 7 janv. 2011 à 16:53, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> We are using mixed naming when referring to a document/page, not only on >> different pages, but also in the same context (Rename step for example). >> There is also an issue referring to this problem >> XWIKI-5401<http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5401>and we need to >> find an answer in order to move forward consistency. >> >> So the question is which version we prefer: "Page" or "Document" ? >> >> I'm voting +1 for "Page". >> >> "Page" is more used IMO, especially in the "Space"/"Page" context. >> "Page" is more general than "Document" and better fitted for a platform that >> encapsulates all kind of content (not just documents). >> >> Please cast your vote. >> Thanks, >> Caty -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
