Right, I agree with that. Just reproduced what we've been doing for most modules until now, but true that description should be a real description.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/25/2011 03:29 PM, jvelociter (SVN) wrote: >> Author: jvelociter >> Date: 2011-01-25 15:29:51 +0100 (Tue, 25 Jan 2011) >> New Revision: 34206 >> >> Modified: >> platform/core/trunk/xwiki-skin/pom.xml >> Log: >> Align name and description with other modules >> >> >> Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-skin/pom.xml >> =================================================================== >> --- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-skin/pom.xml 2011-01-25 12:49:33 UTC (rev >> 34205) >> +++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-skin/pom.xml 2011-01-25 14:29:51 UTC (rev >> 34206) >> @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ >> <version>3.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >> </parent> >> <artifactId>xwiki-core-skin</artifactId> >> -<name>XWiki Core - Skin Component</name> >> -<description>XWiki Core - Skin Component</description> >> +<name>XWiki Platform - Core - Skin</name> > > This is something I really don't like. The description should not be the > same as the name, otherwise there wouldn't be a need to have the same > information in two places. The description should be a real description, > a full sentence that makes sense and really describes what's the module for. > >> +<description>XWiki Platform - Core - Skin</description> >> <properties> >> <xwiki.clirr.skip>true</xwiki.clirr.skip> >> </properties> > > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
