Hi devs,

I am +1 for this strategy because it makes QA job more visible and more 
easy to see. Instead of having a separate page on Incubator or on 
another Wiki, everything goes to JIRA, which is much more easy to follow 
than other sources because it is also a centralized source of bugs.

I am also +1 for what Marius said, IMO it is the most natural approach. 
Thank you Vincent for proposing this, I think this has benefits on all 
sides and eases the work of devs.

Regards,
Sorin B.
> On 01/26/2011 04:41 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Sorin and Silvia are helping us in term of improving the quality of 
>> platform/XE/XEM by systematically testing milestones/RCs/final versions.
>>
>> They've started a TestReports space on xwiki.org where he's going to put all 
>> his test reports from now on:
>> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/TestReports/
>>
>> In those reports, when a test fails they'll need to create a JIRA issue 
>> (instead of pointing to a page on the incubator). This would make it much 
>> easier for reporting purpose, to see all the issues they've created and for 
>> us to see all issues found by the Q&A team.
>>
>> The problem is that our current JIRA strategy is to NOT create jira issue 
>> for issues that haven't been "released" already (instead the strategy is to 
>> comment in them).
>>
>> I'm proposing to relax this rule in the following manner:
>>
>> * Allow to have "affects" and "fix for" be the same value in JIRA
>> * Automatically exclude from our release notes issues where "affects" == 
>> "fixfor"
>>
>> In addition IMO it would be good for Sorin/Silvia to:
>>
>> * Link the newly created jira to an existing jira
>>
>> WDYT?
> +1 provided it is used as a last resort, after:
>
> * making sure the issue is not present in the latest release
> * making sure there aren't any automated tests failing for the same
> reason (->  devs are already notified)
> * asking on IRC or mailing list if there were recent changes to the
> module affected by the issue (->  comment on existing issue)
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to