Le 31 janv. 2011 à 19:48, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit : >> The interest is that it could allow some of the web requests to be served by >> a database that is a slave of the main database, in live synchronization >> with the master MySQL. > > You mean that the public wiki reads data from the read-only database, > which is actually updated by cloning another read-write database updated > from a private wiki?
Actually, the goal is the converse: the internal, robot-oriented xwiki would read the cloned DB. > That's an interesting idea for securing a public server. could be though you need a filtering mechanism thn. > You should also set in xwiki.cfg: > xwiki.readonly=1 why *also* ? > This might reduce some of the errors that you get, although there's a > lot of code that ignores this setting. It would be nice if you could > report (on jira) what exactly breaks so that we can fix it properly. If you say a lot of code ignores that than I'd better not rely on it I'm afraid. Nonetheless, the previous option sounds good. paul _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
