Hi Marius,

very nice, +1 for the {{gallery}} macro.

Guillaume

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:57, Marius Dumitru Florea <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 02/10/2011 10:21 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Hi Marius,
> >
> > On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
> >
> >> Hi devs,
> >>
> >> I'd like to add a gallery macro that will be used like this:
> >>
> >> {{gallery}}
> >> any wiki content
> >> {{/gallery}}
> >>
> >> and which is equivalent to:
> >>
> >> {{velocity output="false"}}
> >> $xwiki.jsfx.use('uicomponents/widgets/gallery/gallery.js')
> >> $xwiki.ssfx.use('uicomponents/widgets/gallery/gallery.css')
> >
>
> > Should these be standard resources? I think it's ok for now but we need
> to think about how to do that in an extension way for the future, in order
> to be able to use the extension manager to add such feature to an installed
> XE.
>
> There was this discussion
> http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/2010-December/021304.html started
> by Anca and in the end she decided to use standard resources because
> they are easier to overwrite. I agree that at some point we need to move
> them inside the macro jar but before we need to find a way to overwrite
> the resources while keeping their request-on-demand nature.
>
> >
> >> {{/velocity}}
> >> (% class="gallery" %)
> >> (((
> >> any wiki content
> >> )))
> >>
> >> Some technical details:
> >> * it won't support in-line mode
> >
>
> > WDYM? Will it break when viewed in inline mode?
>
> Yes. Do you have any valid use case when the gallery should work
> in-line? I view the gallery as a block so I don't see why you would use
> it inside the text like this:
>
> before {{gallery}}image:one.jpg image:two.jpg{{/gallery}} after
>
> >
> >> * it will have two optional parameters: width and height, both expressed
> >> in pixel units (i.e. both are positive integers)
> >
> > Have we decided on a strategy for this? More specifically do we want all
> our visible macros to have style params or do we want users to have to
> surround them with the container macro to add styling (borders, sizes, etc)?
> >
> >  From the POV of users it's probably easier to have params for all
> visible macros. From a logical/reuse POV it's better to wrap any macro with
> the container macro when you need to add styling.
> >
> > WDYT?
>
> In the case of gallery macro the width and height parameters are used to
> limit the size of the displayed images (CSS max-width and max-height).
> It may be possible to determine the width and height from the container
> but it was easier for me to take them from the macro parameters. I'll
> see if I can change the gallery CSS so that it doesn't have to know the
> width and height.
>
> >
> >> * it will handle its content as box macro does (using a
> >> MacroContentParser without running transformations)
> >
> > BTW I think Box Macro needs to be removed now (merged with the container
> macro).
> >
> > Or the Container macro should only care about layout and not styling and
> let the Box macro do the styling...
> >
>
> The gallery macro won't depend on the box macro. I just gave the box
> macro as an example of a macro that accepts any wiki content. Images
> will be extracted on the client side using JavaScript and the the rest
> of the macro content will be hidden through CSS.
>
> Note that I can't filter images on the server side (i.e. look for image
> blocks in the macro content) because I want to support:
>
> {{gallery}}
> {{html}}
> HTML content with images
> {{/html}}
> {{/gallery}}
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> >> * it will be placed in
> xwiki-rendering-macros/xwiki-rendering-macro-gallery/
> >
> > ok for now. I think we need to start moving non technical macros out.
> I'll make a proposal at some point (probably in 3.1)
> >
> >> * images will be displayed as in
> >>
> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/OfficePresentationViewer
> >
> > Nice
> >
> >> Further more, I will change the office importer module to generate:
> >>
> >> {{gallery}}
> >> image:presentation-slide1.jpg
> >>
> >> image:presentation-slide2.jpg
> >> ...
> >> image:presentation-slideN.jpg
> >> {{/gallery}}
> >>
> >> when importing an office presentation file. As a consequence the office
> >> viewer macro will use the gallery macro behind the curtains (i.e.
> >> {{office attachment="presentation.odp"/}} will display the presentation
> >> slides using the gallery macro).
> >
> > +1
> >
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> Note that the gallery macro could be based on a generic macro that:
> >> * wraps the content with a GroupBlock and adds a CSS class name
> >> * uses the SkinExtension component to import some JS/CSS resources
> >> but there is no such macro right now. Another thing to note is that I
> >> can't make gallery macro a wiki macro because the office importer module
> >> will depend on it.
> >
> > Good point.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to