On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:37, Anca Luca <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 02/10/2011 06:27 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> Here is a proposal to reduce all get...Block to 2 methods which >> support matching any Block. >> >> interface Block >> { >> enum TraversalStrategy >> { >> /** Search in parents **/ >> PARENT, >> /** Search in children **/ >> CHILD, >> /** Search recursively in children (and children of children etc...) **/ >> CHILDRECURSE, >> /** Search in previous siblings **/ >> PREVIOUS, >> /** Search recursively in previous siblings (and parent previous >> sibling etc...) **/ >> PREVIOUSRECURSE, >> /** Search in next siblings**/ >> NEXT, >> /** Search recursively in next siblings (and children etc...)**/ >> NEXTRECURSE >> } >> >> [...] >> >> List<Block> getBlocks(BlockMatcher matcher, TraversalStrategy >> traversalStrategy, boolean recurse); >> >> Block getFirstBlock(BlockMatcher matcher, TraversalStrategy >> traversalStrategy, boolean recurse); >> } >> >> interface BlockMatcher >> { >> boolean match(Block block); >> } >> >> et on refactor tous les autres get*Block basé sur ceux la avec des >> BlockMatcher prédéfinis (ClassBlockMatcher, MetaDataBlockMatcher, >> etc...). >> >> Note: the main use case for this change is to support MetaData search. >> >> WDYT (especially on the vocabulary like "TraversalStrategy") ? > > XPath calls these "axes", http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/#axes . > > We could stick to the same naming, since it's well known in the tree > document model world.
Indeed thanks for the reference, i did not know that. > > Otherwise I guess I agree with the change, although any generification > and abstractization of the current already abstract model scares me. > > Thanks, > Anca > >> > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
