On 02/22/2011 03:26 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Proposal 3
> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/SyntaxExperiments3

+1.

>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 14:35, Vincent Massol<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 21, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/19/2010 01:57 PM, Ciprian Amaritei wrote:
>>>> Hi Caty,
>>>> I suggest not to use different colors for syntax chooser buttons since
>> some
>>>> readability issues may occur when changing the background color of the
>> table
>>>> header. An idea would be to use different shades of gray for background
>> as I
>>>> tried in the attached image.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Ciprian.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)<
>>>> [email protected]>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a proposal for compacting the way we show XWiki Syntaxes
>>>>>
>> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/SyntaxExperiments
>>>>>
>>>>> Feedback is welcomed.
>>>
>>> Personally I don't find it useful at all to be able to display more than
>>> one syntax at a time. On the contrary, it's confusing, with all the
>>> different colors and strike-through, and intermixed lines. Instead of a
>>> checkbox behavior, I'd like a radio button behavior.
>>>
>>> I'd also like a global syntax switcher, since users rarely want to look
>>> at mixed syntaxes.
>>
>> That was my first reaction too.
>>
>>> And this brings me to the main point, who is this page for, and how is
>>> it going to be used?
>>
>> It's the help page that you get when you click on help when in wiki edit
>> mode.
>>
>>> I think that since this is a syntax help, most people will use it as a
>>> quick reference for the syntax they need to use at the moment, not as a
>>> comparison tool to check which of the syntaxes is the coolest.
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>


-- 
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to