On Mar 7, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote: > Le 07/03/11 10:46, Vincent Massol a écrit : >> On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote: >> >>> Le 06/03/11 21:37, Vincent Massol a écrit : >>>> On Mar 6, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> web modules are the last remaining com.xpn packages ? >>>> No there are still plugins but for those the best is probably to change >>>> the package when they're replaced by components. I haven't really thought >>>> if users would be impacted by a package change for plugins. >>>> >>> You just need to change xwiki.cfg. >> what do you need to change in xwiki.cfg? > The references to the plugins. They have the full package name in them
That's why I suggested to only changed web/ and not plugins... :) -Vincent > Ludovic >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >>> If you change, I suggest you change ALL >>> >>> So 0- to change only web >>> +1 to change all to org.xwiki >>> >>> Ludovic >>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent >>>> >>>>> Jerome. >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move the web >>>>>> modules to use the org.xwiki groupId and package names. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to use the >>>>>> package of a company (and that of a company that doesn't exist >>>>>> anymore... xpertnet has been replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and >>>>>> I don't think moving web modules to that package/groupid is going to >>>>>> cause any important problems to anyone. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here's my +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
